As part of our continued commitment to academic rigor and ethical publishing, Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal (SiSAL Journal) has introduced a clarification regarding the use of generative AI and expectations for research integrity.
The rise of tools such as ChatGPT has brought new possibilities—and new challenges—to academic writing. While AI can support researchers in various ways, it must not be used to fabricate research findings, participant data, or references.
We would like to emphasize:
- All submitted work must reflect original, verifiable research conducted by the named authors.
- Fabricated data, invented sources, or fictional participant narratives are considered serious breaches of research ethics and will lead to rejection or retraction.
- If AI tools are used for minor writing support (e.g., proofreading or editing), there is no need to disclose it. However, if AI is used for any other purpose, it should be transparently acknowledged.
- Editors may request supporting materials such as anonymized data samples, ethics approval documentation, or clarification on research methods.
As editors, reviewers, and members of the academic community, we are committed to maintaining high ethical standards. We appreciate authors’ cooperation in upholding these principles and invite open dialogue about responsible research practices.
For more information, please see our updated Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement.
SiSAL Journal 